Comparison

Seven apps, no tricks.

A security and privacy comparison built on facts you can check. Where PrivChat loses, we say so; where we could not find a public fact, we put a dash instead of making one up.

Summary The full table Architecture and network Encryption Post-quantum Metadata Identity and sign-up On the device What each one does differently Where PrivChat wins and where it does not Sources

01

Summary

PrivChat is the strictest of the seven in one specific way: your messages pass through no server, there is no account and no phone number, and everything — the key agreement, its renewal, the signatures and the envelope that says who is writing — is post-quantum.

It does not win everywhere. Signal, SimpleX and Briar have published independent audits while ours is internal; almost all of them reach more platforms and are open source. Signal and SimpleX also already protect message content against a quantum computer.

02

The full table

CriterionPrivChatWhatsAppTelegramSignalSimpleXToxBriar
Works without a phone numberYesNoNo ¹NoYesYesYes
Works without an accountYesNoNoNoYesYesYes
Servers everything passes throughNoneMeta’sTelegram’sSignal’sRelays with no identityNoneNone
Who can know who you talk toNobodyMetaTelegram ²Signal, the minimumNobodyYour IP can leakNobody
End-to-end encrypted by defaultYesYesOnly in “secret chats”YesYesYesYes
Post-quantum key agreementYesNoNoYesYesNoNo
The ratchet renews post-quantum tooYesNoNoYes ³YesNoNo
Post-quantum signatures and envelopeYesNoNoNoNoNoNo
Every message the same sizeYesNoNoNoYesNo—
Sends decoys when you are not writingYesNoNoNoNoNoNo
Works with no internetYes: Bluetooth, local network, package or LoRa radio ⁵NoNoNoNoLocal network onlyYes ⁴
PlatformsAndroid, Windows and LinuxAllAllAllAllSeveralAndroid; desktop in beta
Open sourceNoNoClients onlyYesYesYesYes
Security auditInternal, by SecureAuditInternal, by MetaAcademic review (2020)External, publishedTrail of Bits (2022 and 2024)UnauditedCure53 (2017)

¹ Telegram allows signing up with an anonymous +888 number, which is paid for.

² Since 2024 Telegram hands IP addresses and phone numbers to authorities on a valid court order.

³ Signal added the post-quantum ratchet (Triple Ratchet, SPQR) in October 2025.

⁴ Briar syncs over Bluetooth, local wifi or USB with no internet connection at all.

⁵ Since 2.10, PrivChat talks to contacts within range over the same local network or Bluetooth, in a mode both of you turn on on purpose, and by package: a file only the recipient can open, which goes as far as someone carries it; there it does not relay through third parties or look for anyone. Since 2.17 also over LoRa radio, with a Meshtastic or MeshCore node next to the phone: texts travel in encrypted pieces that other mesh nodes repeat for kilometres without being able to open them.

“—” means we could not find a public fact we can check.

Checked in September 2026 against each app’s public documentation. These things change: if you see something wrong or out of date, write to us and we will correct it.

03

Architecture and network

What separates these apps most is not how they encrypt, but where the messages travel.

ModelIs there a server?Network anonymity
PrivChatPeer-to-peer: each device is its own Tor onion serviceNoYes: everything over Tor, with padding and decoys
WhatsAppMeta’s servers, which hold a message until delivery (up to 30 days)YesNo
TelegramTelegram’s servers; regular chats live in its cloudYesNo
SignalSignal’s server, which relays messages and hands out keysYesNo
SimpleXRelays with anonymous queues; messages are deleted on deliveryRelays with no user identityPartial: private routing; Tor optional
ToxDistributed network (DHT); both ends must be onlineNoNo: your contacts see your IP
BriarPeer-to-peer over Tor, Bluetooth, wifi or USBNoYes, over Tor

04

Encryption

They all encrypt content well. The differences are in how keys are agreed and how they are renewed.

Key agreementRenewalSignatures
PrivChatPQXDH: X25519 + ML-KEM-768Double Ratchet with ML-KEM-768 in every epochEd25519 + ML-DSA-65, both required
WhatsAppSignal ProtocolDouble RatchetClassical
Telegram2048-bit Diffie-Hellman (MTProto 2.0), secret chats onlyNew key every 100 messages or every week, secret chats only—
SignalPQXDH: X25519 + ML-KEM (since 2023)Triple Ratchet with SPQR, post-quantum (since 2025)Classical
SimpleXHybrid post-quantum exchange inside the Double RatchetPost-quantum Double RatchetClassical
ToxCurve25519 (NaCl)——
BriarBramble protocol——

05

Post-quantum

A future quantum computer does not only break tomorrow’s traffic: it opens whatever someone recorded today. That is why it matters how far each app has gone.

Key agreementRenewalSignaturesEnvelope (who writes)
PrivChatYesYesYesYes
WhatsAppNoNoNoNo
TelegramNoNoNoNo
SignalYesYesNoNo
SimpleXYesYesNo—
ToxNoNoNoNo
BriarNoNoNoNo

Signal and SimpleX already protect content against a quantum computer. What PrivChat adds is the signatures and the envelope: nobody can forge an identity or later work out who was writing to whom.

06

Metadata

Who talks to whom, when and how much. It often says more than the message itself.

Who can know itWhat the service keepsAgainst traffic analysis
PrivChatNobody: there is no serviceNothing: there is no serverUniform size and decoys when you are not writing
WhatsAppMetaUsage and device data, per its policyNo
TelegramTelegramPhone number, IP and activity; handed over on court orders since 2024No
SignalSignal, the minimumSign-up date and last connection dateNo
SimpleXNobodyRelays hold no user identityUniform size
ToxYour contacts see your IPNo serverNo
BriarNobodyNo server—

07

Identity and sign-up

What you have to hand over to start using it.

Phone numberAccountHow you are identified
PrivChatNoNoA key; added with a QR code and verified with a fingerprint
WhatsAppYesYesPhone number
TelegramYes, or a paid anonymous +888 numberYesNumber and username
SignalYes, to registerYesNumber; optional username since 2024
SimpleXNoNoNo persistent identifier, not even a random one
ToxNoNoPublic key (Tox ID)
BriarNoNoLink or QR code

08

On the device

What protects your data when someone has your phone or computer in their hands.

Local encryptionLockEmergency wipe
PrivChatSQLCipher: system keystore key on the phone, 13-word phrase on the computerPIN on the phone (Argon2id); phrase on the computerPanic PIN on the phone, which destroys the keys
WhatsApp—Biometrics or passcode—
Telegram—Passcode—
SignalEncrypted databasePIN, biometrics—
SimpleXDatabase encrypted with a passphrasePasscodeSelf-destruct passcode
Tox———
BriarDatabase encrypted with a passwordPassword—

09

What each one does differently

PrivChat

One-way channels with their own Tor address; decoys when you are not writing; post-quantum signatures and envelope; panic PIN.

WhatsApp

The largest user base in the world; communities and group calls.

Telegram

Huge channels, bots, groups of up to 200,000 members and cloud sync.

Signal

The reference for end-to-end encryption; calls; usernames; post-quantum ratchet.

SimpleX

No user identifier at all, not even a random one; hidden profiles; incognito mode.

Tox

No infrastructure at all; several compatible clients.

Briar

Works without internet, over Bluetooth, wifi or USB; designed for crises and blackouts.

10

Where PrivChat wins and where it does not

Where it wins

  • It is the only one of the seven with post-quantum signatures and a post-quantum envelope.
  • It is the only one that sends decoys when you are not writing. SimpleX also makes every message the same size.
  • No server, no number, no account. Briar and Tox have none either; SimpleX uses relays with no identity.
  • The panic PIN destroys the keys. SimpleX has a similar self-destruct passcode.

Where it does not

  • It has no independent audit: SecureAudit audits it internally. Signal, SimpleX and Briar have published ones.
  • It is not open source.
  • It is not on iPhone yet (in testing).
  • Groups hold up to 200 people and are text-only; WhatsApp, Telegram and Signal allow far more, with photos.
  • It is little known: your contacts most likely do not have it yet.

11

Sources